@[email protected] 是我吗 是修修
【抗爭防護裝備資源】
考慮到中國目前的示威情況
中國的朋友可能要有心理以及物資準備進行武力升級
以下是香港過往抗爭中的 防護裝備清單,不知道幫助有多大
祝各位武運昌隆
《防具 口罩 圖鑑& 購買連結 保護自已 保護他人 》
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1X_p56W1VLpfWTqdVb3-C8wlLMzfcy8qH6h8w41VTyu4/edit#gid=0
《如何用一件T shirt快速蒙面》
@snoopyxuan 对 没什么不能直接问的 倒也提供了一个深入了解的接口 但感觉大家日常互相回复交流完全足够了
1984初见 Chpt 8
“They were like the ant, which can see small objects but not large ones. And when memory failed and written records were falsified — when that happened, the claim of the Party to have improved the conditions of human life had got to be accepted, because there did not exist, and never again could exist, any standard against which it could be tested.”
1984初见 Chpt 8
“In principle a Party member had no spare time, and was never alone except in bed. It was assumed that when he was not working, eating, or sleeping he would be taking part in some kind of communal recreation: to do anything that suggested a taste for solitude, even to go for a walk by yourself, was always slightly dangerous. There was a word for it in Newspeak: OWNLIFE, it was called, meaning individualism and eccentricity.”
1984初见 Chpt 7
“With the feeling that he was speaking to O’Brien, and also that he was setting forth an important axiom, he wrote:
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.”
1984初见 Chpt 7
“The sexual puritanism of the Party was not imposed upon them. Promiscuity went unpunished, divorce was permitted. For that matter, even religious worship would have been permitted if the proles had shown any sign of needing or wanting it. They were beneath suspicion. As the Party slogan put it: ‘Proles and animals are free.”
1984初见 Chpt 7
“…spreading false rumours and marking down and eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous; but no attempt was made to indoctrinate them with the ideology of the Party. It was not desirable that the proles should have strong political feelings. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary to make them accept longer working-hours or shorter rations.”
1984初见 Chpt 6
“The Party did not permit divorce, but it rather encouraged separation in cases where there were no children.”
……
“And what he wanted, more even than to be loved, was to break down that wall of virtue, even if it were only once in his whole life. The sexual act, successfully performed, was rebellion. Desire was thoughtcrime. Even to have awakened Katharine, if he could have achieved it, would have been like a seduction, although she was his wife.”
1984初见 Chpt 6
“All marriages between Party members had to be approved by a committee appointed for the purpose, and — though the principle was never clearly stated — permission was always refused if the couple concerned gave the impression of being physically attracted to one another. The only recognized purpose of marriage was to beget children for the service of the Party.”
1984初见 Chpt 6
“The aim of the Party was not merely to prevent men and women from forming loyalties which it might not be able to control. Its real, undeclared purpose was to remove all pleasure from the sexual act. Not love so much as eroticism was the enemy, inside marriage as well as outside it.”
修修 比格版